When Harvard Hired a Historian to Confront Its Past, Nobody Expected This
For centuries, Harvard University has stood as a symbol of academic excellence and progressive ideals. But beneath its ivy-covered walls lies a history entangled with one of America’s darkest legacies: slavery. In 2019, the university commissioned a groundbreaking study to investigate its historical ties to enslaved people—a move praised as a step toward transparency. The researcher at the center of this project, however, claims his findings cost him his career.
The Uncomfortable Truths Behind the Ivy
Sven Beckert, a Harvard history professor and co-chair of the university’s “Committee on Harvard & the Legacy of Slavery,” was tasked with leading a team to uncover uncomfortable truths. What began as an effort to “acknowledge and remedy past wrongs” quickly revealed a sprawling network of connections between Harvard’s early donors, faculty, and the transatlantic slave trade.
Beckert’s team found that enslaved people were not just peripheral to Harvard’s story—they were foundational. Enslaved individuals labored on campus as early as the 1630s, maintaining buildings and serving faculty. Wealth generated from plantations and slave-trading ventures funded scholarships, professorships, and even the construction of iconic campus buildings. One donor, Isaac Royall Jr., whose family wealth came from enslaved labor in Antigua, endowed Harvard’s first law professorship in 1815. The Royall family crest, featuring wheat sheaves cultivated by enslaved people, still adorns the law school’s seal.
“We weren’t prepared for the scale of what we found,” Beckert later told reporters. “Enslaved people were embedded in every layer of Harvard’s early history. This wasn’t a footnote—it was the story.”
A Clash Over Transparency
As the committee’s findings grew more damning, tensions flared behind closed doors. Beckert alleges that Harvard administrators pressured him to soften the report’s language, particularly sections implicating revered figures like early Harvard presidents and donors. “There was a clear message: ‘Don’t make us look bad,’” he said. When he refused, his contract as co-chair was abruptly terminated in 2022.
Harvard denies retaliating against Beckert, stating the committee’s work continued “uninterrupted” under new leadership. Yet critics argue the university’s actions contradict its public commitment to reckoning with slavery. “If Harvard can’t handle the truth about its own history,” wrote historian Anne Twitty in The Chronicle of Higher Education, “what does that say about its commitment to racial justice today?”
The Broader Fight Over Historical Accountability
Harvard isn’t alone in grappling with its ties to slavery. Institutions like Georgetown University and the University of Virginia have launched similar initiatives, often facing backlash from alumni or donors resistant to tarnishing their legacies. But Beckert’s case highlights a deeper conflict: Who controls the narrative of an institution’s past?
For universities, transparency risks alienating stakeholders or fueling demands for reparations. In 2022, Harvard pledged $100 million to address its legacy of slavery, including scholarships for descendants of enslaved people and partnerships with historically Black colleges. Yet Beckert argues these efforts ring hollow without full accountability. “You can’t fix a problem you won’t fully name,” he said.
Why This Matters Beyond Academia
The battle over Harvard’s history isn’t just about correcting the record—it’s about how institutions wield power. For centuries, elite universities have shaped cultural narratives, often erasing marginalized voices. By confronting slavery’s role in their founding, they could redefine what it means to be a “prestigious” institution in a modern, equitable society.
Beckert’s ordeal also raises questions about academic freedom. If researchers face career consequences for uncovering inconvenient truths, what does that mean for future scholarship? “History isn’t a PR tool,” said legal scholar Randall Kennedy. “It’s a discipline meant to challenge, not comfort, those in power.”
The Path Forward
Despite the controversy, Beckert’s work has ignited a movement. Students and faculty now demand that Harvard rename buildings tied to slaveholders and expand its reparations fund. Meanwhile, the university’s final report, published in 2022, acknowledges “moral culpability” for benefiting from slavery—a step Beckert calls “necessary, but insufficient.”
His story serves as a cautionary tale: Reckoning with the past requires more than symbolic gestures. It demands courage to confront systemic injustices, even when they implicate the powerful. As debates over critical race theory and historical education rage nationwide, institutions like Harvard have a choice: Will they lead by example, or cling to myths that obscure the truth?
For now, the answer remains uncertain. But one thing is clear: The ghosts of Harvard’s past won’t stay buried quietly.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » When Harvard Hired a Historian to Confront Its Past, Nobody Expected This