Why AI in Classrooms Might Be a Bigger Problem Than Phones—and What We Can Do About It
Walk into any modern classroom, and you’ll see students glued to screens. For years, smartphones were public enemy number one in education. Teachers complained about distractions, shortened attention spans, and the endless battle to keep kids focused. But now, a new player has entered the scene: artificial intelligence. While AI tools like ChatGPT, Grammarly, or AI-powered tutoring apps promise to revolutionize learning, there’s a growing concern that they might do more harm than good—and the stakes could be higher than we ever imagined.
Let’s unpack this. Phones disrupted classrooms by pulling students away from learning. AI, on the other hand, is disrupting learning itself. It’s not just about distraction anymore; it’s about fundamentally altering how students engage with knowledge, creativity, and critical thinking. Here’s why some educators and researchers are sounding the alarm.
—
1. AI Shortcuts: When “Helpful” Tools Stifle Learning
AI writing assistants, math solvers, and even coding tools are marketed as productivity boosters. But in practice, they often become crutches. A student struggling with an essay can ask ChatGPT to generate a first draft, tweak a few sentences, and submit it as their own. Similarly, AI math apps can solve equations step-by-step, leaving students to copy answers without grasping the logic.
The problem? These tools bypass the messy, essential process of figuring things out. Learning isn’t just about getting the right answer—it’s about building neural pathways through trial, error, and persistence. When AI does the heavy lifting, students miss out on developing problem-solving skills, analytical thinking, and the confidence that comes from overcoming challenges.
Dr. Linda Patel, a high school English teacher, puts it bluntly: “I’ve graded essays that were clearly AI-generated. They’re grammatically flawless but lack originality or depth. Students aren’t learning to think; they’re learning to outsource thinking.”
—
2. The Illusion of Mastery
AI tools often give students a false sense of competence. Imagine a student using an AI paraphrasing tool to “rewrite” a complex historical text. They might hand in a polished summary without ever engaging with the material. On the surface, their work looks complete, but they haven’t internalized the content or practiced critical reading skills.
This is especially dangerous in subjects like math and science. AI solvers can show the steps to solve a problem, but without guided practice, students don’t develop the muscle memory or intuition needed for advanced coursework. A 2023 Stanford study found that students who relied on AI for homework scored 20% lower on exams compared to peers who solved problems manually.
“AI creates a ‘quick fix’ culture,” says Dr. Rajesh Kumar, an educational psychologist. “Students start prioritizing speed over understanding, and that mindset carries into every aspect of their education.”
—
3. Creativity Takes a Hit
One of the most underrated casualties of AI overuse is creativity. Writing, art, and even coding thrive on original thought and experimentation. But when students use AI to generate ideas, outlines, or even entire projects, they’re skipping the brainstorming and iteration phases that fuel innovation.
Take creative writing, for example. A student prompting ChatGPT to “write a story about a time-traveling detective” might get a coherent narrative, but it won’t have the quirks, personal voice, or imaginative risks that come from a human mind. Over time, reliance on AI can dull a student’s ability to think outside the box or take creative risks.
This isn’t hypothetical. A recent Harvard study found that students who frequently used AI for creative tasks scored lower on measures of divergent thinking—the ability to generate multiple solutions to a problem.
—
4. AI vs. Phones: A Nuanced Comparison
Phones disrupt classrooms by competing for attention. Students scroll social media, text friends, or play games instead of listening to lectures. The harm is real, but it’s largely about distraction—students aren’t engaged, but the content of their education remains intact.
AI introduces a different threat: corruption of the learning process itself. It doesn’t just pull students away from work; it changes how they approach the work. When AI handles research, writing, and problem-solving, students aren’t just distracted—they’re deprived of opportunities to build skills that phones never touched, like critical analysis, logical reasoning, or creative expression.
Plus, AI’s impact is harder to detect. A student staring at a phone is obviously off-task. A student using ChatGPT to write an essay might look productive, even if their learning is superficial.
—
5. The Cheating Dilemma Gets Trickier
Plagiarism detection tools are struggling to keep up with AI. While teachers can spot a copied Wikipedia paragraph, AI-generated content is often original enough to bypass traditional checks. This creates a gray area: Is using AI to write a paper cheating? What about using it to brainstorm ideas or structure an argument?
Schools haven’t settled these questions, leaving students confused about ethical boundaries. In the meantime, AI makes cheating easier, faster, and more tempting than ever. A 2024 survey by the National Education Association found that 34% of high school students admitted to using AI tools to complete assignments—a number that’s likely underreported.
—
What Can Educators Do?
Banning AI outright isn’t realistic (or wise). Instead, schools need to rethink how these tools are used:
1. Set Clear Guidelines: Define when and how AI can be used. For example, allowing it for brainstorming but not drafting.
2. Focus on Process: Assign work that emphasizes critical thinking over final products, like in-class essays or handwritten problem sets.
3. Teach Digital Literacy: Help students understand AI’s limitations, biases, and ethical implications.
4. Use AI as a Supplement, Not a Substitute: Encourage tools like Grammarly for editing (after a student writes a first draft) or Khan Academy for practice problems—not as primary solutions.
—
The Bottom Line
AI isn’t inherently “stupid”—it’s a powerful tool that’s being used stupidly in many classrooms. The risk isn’t the technology itself; it’s how we’re allowing it to replace the hard, rewarding work of learning. Unlike phones, which distract from education, AI has the potential to hollow out education from within.
The solution isn’t to fear AI but to wield it thoughtfully. By setting boundaries and prioritizing skill development over shortcuts, we can ensure that AI enhances learning instead of undermining it. After all, the goal of education isn’t just to finish assignments—it’s to build minds that can think, create, and adapt long after the classroom door closes.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why AI in Classrooms Might Be a Bigger Problem Than Phones—and What We Can Do About It