Why Gender-Specific Extracurriculars Are Alienating Students (And What Schools Can Do About It)
When 14-year-old Mia asked to join her school’s robotics club, she was met with snickers. “Shouldn’t you sign up for cheerleading instead?” a classmate jeered. Stories like Mia’s aren’t uncommon. Across schools, extracurricular activities labeled as “for girls” often carry unspoken rules about what interests are “appropriate” based on gender—and students are pushing back. From coding clubs to chess teams, activities once dominated by boys now see growing female participation. Yet outdated stereotypes still cling to many programs, leaving students feeling grossed out by the pressure to conform.
The Problem with “Girls’” Extracurriculars
Walk into any school, and you’ll likely find activities unofficially (or sometimes explicitly) branded as feminine: dance teams, baking clubs, crafts workshops, or volunteer groups focused on “nurturing” roles. While there’s nothing wrong with these interests, the issue arises when they’re framed as the only options for girls—or when boys face ridicule for joining them.
Take theater programs, for example. While drama clubs attract diverse participants, girls are often steered toward costume design or makeup roles, while boys dominate stage crew or lighting. Similarly, coding camps marketed with pink logos and “sparkly” themes send a clear message: This is for girls, but don’t expect it to be taken as seriously as the boys’ STEM programs.
Why These Labels Backfire
Gendered extracurriculars aren’t just annoying—they reinforce harmful stereotypes. A 2022 study by the National Education Association found that girls in schools with highly gendered activity structures were 30% less likely to explore interests outside “traditional” domains. Boys, meanwhile, reported avoiding “girls’” clubs altogether due to fear of bullying.
The problem goes deeper than hurt feelings. When schools categorize activities by gender, they:
1. Limit self-discovery: Students miss chances to explore passions that defy stereotypes.
2. Perpetuate bias: Labeling activities as “for girls” implies they’re less competitive or intellectually rigorous.
3. Isolate nonbinary students: Gender-specific clubs force LGBTQ+ youth to choose sides or opt out entirely.
The Roots of the Disconnect
So why do these labels persist? Much of it stems from societal conditioning. From toddlerhood, girls are handed dolls and tea sets, while boys get building blocks—a pattern that extends to school activities. Well-meaning educators sometimes lean into these tropes to “boost participation,” not realizing they’re narrowing opportunities.
Commercial influences play a role, too. Companies market science kits for girls with pastel packaging and beauty-themed experiments (“Create glitter slime while learning chemistry!”), subtly suggesting science must be “feminized” to appeal to them. Meanwhile, robotics competitions for boys emphasize toughness and competition.
How Schools Can Fix the Mess
The solution isn’t to eliminate traditionally feminine activities but to decouple them from gender expectations. Here’s how:
1. Audit your program names and marketing
Replace “Girls Who Code” with “Code Creators.” Ditch the floral fonts and rainbow banners unless they’re used universally. Highlight skills gained (e.g., “Master Python programming”) rather than gender.
2. Train staff to challenge stereotypes
When a student says, “Only girls do dance,” teachers should respond: “Really? Let’s look up male professional dancers together.” Educators must model inclusive language and shut down gendered teasing.
3. Create crossover opportunities
Merge “boys’” and “girls’” clubs where possible. A woodworking class could partner with an art club to build sets for the school play. Mixed groups normalize collaboration and break down barriers.
4. Amplify diverse role models
Invite female engineers, male nurses, and nonbinary artists to speak. When students see professionals thriving in “nontraditional” roles, it expands their vision of what’s possible.
5. Let students lead
Form a student committee to review extracurricular offerings. Teens are often more attuned to what feels exclusionary—and more creative in fixing it.
Success Stories: Schools Getting It Right
In Oregon, Lincoln High scrapped its “Home Ec for Girls” course and launched “Life Skills Lab,” where all students learn cooking, budgeting, and basic repairs. Enrollment tripled, with 40% male participation.
Meanwhile, a Texas middle school merged its separate robotics teams into one gender-neutral group. Within a year, the team won a state championship—and female members reported feeling “finally taken seriously.”
The Bigger Picture
Extracurriculars should be a playground for curiosity, not a prison of stereotypes. By dismantling gendered labels, schools send a powerful message: Your interests matter, not your gender. For students like Mia, who eventually joined robotics after her school revamped its clubs, that shift makes all the difference. “No one cares if I’m a girl here,” she says. “We’re all just builders.”
It’s time to stop grossing kids out with outdated norms—and start inspiring them with possibilities.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why Gender-Specific Extracurriculars Are Alienating Students (And What Schools Can Do About It)