Why Have We Normalized Marketing to Children?
Let’s face it: Turn on a cartoon channel, scroll through a kids’ app, or walk down a toy aisle, and you’ll immediately notice one thing—advertisements aimed squarely at children. Colorful characters, catchy jingles, and persuasive messages are everywhere, designed to grab the attention of even the youngest viewers. Yet, society often shrugs at this reality. Why have we, as a culture, largely accepted advertising to children as inevitable? The answer lies in a mix of historical shifts, economic forces, and psychological blind spots that have quietly reshaped our norms around childhood and consumerism.
The Evolution of Child-Centric Marketing
To understand today’s acceptance of ads targeting kids, we need to rewind to the mid-20th century. Before television dominated households, children weren’t seen as a distinct consumer group. That changed in the 1950s and ’60s when TV became a fixture in living rooms, and advertisers realized something groundbreaking: Kids influenced household spending. Cereal companies led the charge, pairing sugary products with Saturday morning cartoons. By the 1980s, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) attempted to regulate such ads, citing ethical concerns, but lobbying efforts by the industry watered down restrictions.
This marked a turning point. Over decades, ads targeting children shifted from being controversial to commonplace. Parents grew accustomed to commercials during kids’ programming, and brands perfected strategies to make children “brand-loyal” early. The message became normalized: Marketing to kids wasn’t exploitation—it was just business.
The Psychology of Acceptance: “They’re Just Having Fun!”
One reason adults tolerate child-focused ads is the clever way they’re disguised as entertainment. Think of toy unboxing videos on YouTube or mobile games where collecting virtual coins feels like play, not a sales pitch. Advertisers understand that blurring the line between content and commerce disarms criticism. When a child laughs at a cartoon mascot promoting a snack, parents may think, What’s the harm?
But research suggests there’s more at play. Studies show children under 8 struggle to distinguish ads from regular content, making them uniquely vulnerable to persuasion. Yet, society often dismisses these concerns. Psychologists point to a cognitive bias called “normalization fatigue”—when a practice becomes so widespread that people stop questioning it, even if it feels problematic. Over time, constant exposure to ads aimed at kids has numbed many to their potential impact.
The Economic Engine Behind the Silence
Money talks—and in this case, it shouts. The global market for children’s products, from toys to tech, is worth hundreds of billions annually. Advertisers argue that marketing drives innovation, allowing companies to fund kid-friendly content like free apps or TV shows. Without ads, they claim, these resources wouldn’t exist.
This economic argument has swayed policymakers. In the U.S., for example, regulations on child-targeted ads remain looser than in countries like Norway or Sweden, where such advertising is banned outright. Corporate lobbyists emphasize job creation and economic growth, framing criticism as anti-business sentiment. Meanwhile, schools and media platforms, often underfunded, may rely on sponsored content or ads to stay afloat, creating a cycle of dependency.
Parental Dilemmas and Digital Age Challenges
Parents aren’t oblivious to these tactics, but modern life complicates resistance. With screens occupying a central role in education and entertainment, avoiding ads entirely feels impossible. A 2022 survey found that 68% of parents feel guilty about their kids’ screen time but see few alternatives. Advertisers exploit this guilt by positioning products as solutions—educational apps! Healthy snacks!—making parents feel they’re making “better” choices, even while consuming more.
The digital era has intensified these issues. Algorithms on platforms like TikTok or Roblox track children’s preferences, delivering hyper-personalized ads. Unlike TV commercials, which parents could monitor, these ads are omnipresent and adaptive. Yet, many adults still view digital literacy as a future skill, not realizing that today’s toddlers are already being shaped by targeted marketing.
A Shift in the Wind?
Despite decades of acceptance, cracks are appearing in the facade. Advocacy groups and pediatricians increasingly highlight links between advertising exposure and issues like childhood obesity, materialism, and anxiety. In 2020, the American Academy of Pediatrics called for stricter regulations on junk food ads targeting kids. Meanwhile, Gen Z parents, raised in the ad-saturated ’90s, are pushing back by embracing ad-free streaming services or “commercial-free” parenting movements.
Countries are taking notice. France bans junk food ads during children’s programming, and the European Union is tightening rules on data-driven ads for minors. Even some tech companies, facing public pressure, now offer ad-free versions of apps—for a subscription fee, of course.
The Path Forward: Awareness or Resignation?
The normalization of child-targeted ads isn’t accidental; it’s the result of decades of strategic messaging by industries that profit from young consumers. Yet, awareness is growing. Educators are teaching media literacy earlier, and parents are demanding transparency about how data is collected from kids.
But real change requires confronting uncomfortable truths: That convenience often outweighs ethics in consumer culture, and that protecting children’s innocence clashes with economic interests. Until society reckons with these trade-offs, ads targeting kids will persist—not because we’re okay with them, but because we’ve yet to muster the collective will to say, “Enough.”
In the end, the question isn’t just why we’ve accepted advertising to children, but whether we’ll continue to accept it as the next generation grows up in an even more commercialized world. The answer will shape not just childhoods, but the future of consumer culture itself.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why Have We Normalized Marketing to Children